NCAA Tournament March Madness
#105 Samford
Bubble Watch | Bracketology
Chat with the Bracketologist | How does this work?
Projected seed: 11 (automatic qualifier)
Samford's strong offensive capabilities, highlighted by impressive scoring outputs against teams like North Alabama and N Dakota St, contrast sharply with their defensive struggles, as seen in losses to Michigan State and Cornell. While the team has managed to secure key wins, such as their recent victory over UNC Greensboro, inconsistency against formidable opponents could hinder their chances. With several critical games ahead, including matchups against ETSU and Chattanooga, Samford has a prime opportunity to solidify their standing; however, faltering in these contests—or failing to maintain their offensive intensity—could jeopardize their postseason aspirations.
Date | Opponent | Ranking | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
11/8 | @Cornell | 143 | L88-86 |
11/15 | @North Alabama | 131 | W97-96 |
11/17 | TX Southern | 309 | W97-82 |
11/19 | @Michigan St | 14 | L83-75 |
11/26 | N Dakota St | 92 | W103-98 |
11/27 | Utah Valley | 132 | W84-76 |
11/29 | West Georgia | 339 | W86-65 |
12/5 | @S Carolina St | 223 | W88-81 |
12/8 | Austin Peay | 294 | W72-47 |
12/18 | @Arizona | 16 | L96-64 |
12/21 | @Alabama A&M | 361 | W97-90 |
1/1 | Citadel | 354 | W86-56 |
1/4 | @W Carolina | 355 | W88-69 |
1/9 | VMI | 303 | W81-68 |
1/11 | UNC Greensboro | 109 | W76-69 |
1/15 | @Mercer | 240 | W75-74 |
1/18 | ETSU | 130 | L65-60 |
1/22 | @Chattanooga | 162 | 50% |
1/23 | @Chattanooga | 162 | 50% |
1/25 | Wofford | 112 | 55% |
1/29 | @Furman | 142 | 48% |
2/1 | @Citadel | 354 | 65% |
2/5 | Mercer | 240 | 62% |
2/8 | @ETSU | 130 | 48% |
2/12 | Chattanooga | 162 | 58% |
2/15 | @Wofford | 112 | 47% |
2/19 | Furman | 142 | 56% |
2/22 | W Carolina | 355 | 72% |
2/27 | @VMI | 303 | 59% |
3/1 | @UNC Greensboro | 109 | 46% |