NCAA Tournament March Madness

#323 Stonehill

Bubble Watch | Bracketology

Chat with the Bracketologist | How does this work?


Projection: need to automatically qualify

Stonehill’s resume presents significant challenges for NCAA tournament consideration. Their performance against stronger opponents, like the games against Notre Dame and Marquette, showcased their struggle against higher-tier competition, with wide margins of defeat. Though they secured a few wins against teams with lower rankings, such as victories over New Hampshire and Chicago State, those wins don’t carry the weight needed to bolster their tournament credibility. Additionally, inconsistent play, like their recent loss to F Dickinson, raises concerns over their competitiveness. To improve their standing, a strong finish in conference play will be crucial, along with potential success in the NEC tournament to secure an automatic bid.

Date Opponent Ranking Outcome
11/6@Notre Dame95L89-60
11/9@Providence94L76-49
11/14@Robert Morris150L63-51
11/15(N)New Orleans347W80-54
11/17(N)Lindenwood328L75-74
11/21Bryant154W67-66
11/25East Texas A&M329W67-65
11/27@Marquette23L94-59
12/1Quinnipiac210W88-74
12/15@Boston College196L73-69
12/18@MA Lowell242L78-67
12/22New Hampshire355W90-83
12/29@Lafayette287W70-65
1/3@Mercyhurst338L76-69
1/5@St Francis PA318W64-60
1/10LIU Brooklyn294L70-60
1/12@Chicago St361W68-52
1/20@Le Moyne353L73-72
1/24Chicago St361W75-73
1/26F Dickinson310L65-54
1/30Wagner342W73-61
2/1Central Conn180L71-63
2/8@LIU Brooklyn294L62-59
2/13St Francis PA318W79-74
2/15Mercyhurst338W85-73
2/20@Wagner342L63-57
2/22@Central Conn180L67-41
2/27@F Dickinson310L82-69
3/1Le Moyne353W85-79
3/5@F Dickinson310L71-56