NCAA Tournament March Madness
#134 Wofford
Bubble Watch | Bracketology
Chat with the Bracketologist | How does this work?
Projection: need to automatically qualify
Wofford's season reflects a challenging path, highlighted by close losses against key opponents like Lipscomb and UNC Greensboro, which demonstrate their ability to compete but also expose weaknesses in crunch time. The defeats against strong teams such as Duke and the inconsistent performance in conference play—especially the loss to Chattanooga—are red flags. However, their victories over teams like St. Thomas and ETSU show potential for growth. To enhance their tournament hopes, they must capitalize on upcoming games against lower-ranked opponents and secure crucial wins to strengthen their resume and build momentum heading into the postseason.
Date | Opponent | Ranking | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
11/9 | @Lipscomb | 85 | L78-69 |
11/13 | @Presbyterian | 235 | L71-68 |
11/16 | @Duke | 1 | L86-35 |
11/22 | (N)St Thomas MN | 121 | W81-73 |
11/23 | @WI Milwaukee | 130 | L76-74 |
11/24 | (N)Portland St | 189 | L79-74 |
12/1 | North Alabama | 112 | W74-54 |
12/4 | Gardner Webb | 254 | W88-64 |
12/7 | @Elon | 183 | L79-56 |
12/16 | @Col Charleston | 149 | L77-67 |
12/18 | @St Louis | 105 | W74-71 |
1/1 | UNC Greensboro | 135 | L68-66 |
1/4 | @ETSU | 138 | W81-78 |
1/8 | W Carolina | 348 | W77-69 |
1/13 | @Furman | 142 | W81-62 |
1/15 | @Chattanooga | 117 | L83-81 |
1/18 | Mercer | 250 | W69-49 |
1/22 | Citadel | 355 | W79-68 |
1/25 | @Samford | 104 | L77-61 |
1/29 | VMI | 298 | L74-67 |
2/1 | @UNC Greensboro | 135 | W74-62 |
2/5 | Chattanooga | 117 | L79-70 |
2/8 | @Mercer | 250 | W77-66 |
2/12 | @Citadel | 355 | W74-71 |
2/15 | Samford | 104 | L76-68 |
2/19 | @VMI | 298 | W82-43 |
2/22 | ETSU | 138 | L73-68 |
2/26 | @W Carolina | 348 | W90-67 |
3/1 | Furman | 142 | L78-75 |
3/8 | (N)ETSU | 138 | 50% |