NCAA Tournament March Madness
#154 Toledo
Bubble Watch | Bracketology
Chat with the Bracketologist | How does this work?
Projection: need to automatically qualify
Toledo’s résumé is defined by a high-scoring offense that produced strong moments away from home and on neutral floors, most notably wins at Wright State and neutral-site success against Troy and solid home victories over Detroit and Youngstown State, while those bright spots are offset by damaging defeats to Belmont at a neutral site and road setbacks at South Alabama, Oakland and Marshall that expose a vulnerable defense. The best results show the team can close games outside its building and contend in tougher environments, but the bad losses on the road and at neutral venues cap the upside and leave work to do. The remaining slate hands Toledo multiple chances at home to rebuild momentum alongside a handful of difficult road tests such as the trip to Michigan State and a visit to Akron that will be true resume-makers if they go right and resume-damaging if they go wrong, which is why the current placement feels consistent with both what the team has already done and what it still needs to prove.
| Date | Opponent | Ranking | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/3 | South Alabama | 172 | L76-74 |
| 11/8 | Marshall | 153 | L85-73 |
| 11/11 | @Wright St | 142 | W81-71 |
| 11/15 | Detroit | 297 | W90-83 |
| 11/19 | Youngstown St | 159 | W92-75 |
| 11/24 | (N)Troy | 148 | W75-68 |
| 11/26 | (N)Belmont | 74 | L87-72 |
| 12/6 | @Oakland | 145 | L98-97 |
| 12/13 | @Robert Morris | 179 | 45% |
| 12/16 | @Michigan St | 12 | 3% |
| 12/30 | W Michigan | 242 | 76% |
| 1/3 | @C Michigan | 313 | 71% |
| 1/6 | @N Illinois | 327 | 74% |
| 1/9 | Miami OH | 120 | 50% |
| 1/10 | Miami OH | 120 | 50% |
| 1/13 | Ohio | 199 | 70% |
| 1/17 | @Kent | 128 | 31% |
| 1/20 | @Massachusetts | 177 | 44% |
| 1/24 | Bowling Green | 116 | 49% |
| 1/27 | @Akron | 54 | 12% |
| 1/31 | Ball St | 321 | 88% |
| 2/3 | Kent | 128 | 53% |
| 2/11 | @W Michigan | 242 | 56% |
| 2/14 | @Bowling Green | 116 | 28% |
| 2/21 | E Michigan | 207 | 72% |
| 2/24 | N Illinois | 327 | 89% |
| 2/28 | @Ohio | 199 | 49% |
| 3/3 | @Miami OH | 120 | 29% |
| 3/6 | Buffalo | 204 | 71% |