NCAA Tournament March Madness
#136 Kent
Bubble Watch | Bracketology
Chat with the Bracketologist | How does this work?
Projection: need to automatically qualify
Kent's resume shows a mix of solid wins but lacks marquee victories that would elevate their profile for at-large consideration. Their wins against lower-ranked teams like Louisiana and Cleveland State demonstrate they can handle lesser opponents, but losses against heavyweights like Auburn and Alabama highlight the gap in talent. The lack of quality wins, such as the close contest with UC Irvine, raises concerns about their ability to perform under pressure. The upcoming games are critical; victories against conference opponents like Akron and Miami (OH) will be essential. If they can capitalize on their chances against teams with better rankings and avoid slip-ups against weaker opponents, they might just secure a spot in the tournament.
Date | Opponent | Ranking | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
11/4 | @Louisiana | 330 | W70-66 |
11/13 | @Auburn | 1 | L79-56 |
11/21 | Niagara | 290 | W76-73 |
11/23 | @Cleveland St | 225 | W68-52 |
11/28 | (N)Towson | 229 | W65-54 |
11/29 | (N)UC Irvine | 57 | L51-39 |
11/30 | (N)Kennesaw | 194 | W67-60 |
12/6 | Portland | 329 | W76-57 |
12/15 | Mercyhurst | 340 | W82-57 |
12/22 | @Alabama | 8 | L81-54 |
1/4 | Ball St | 260 | L75-67 |
1/7 | @N Illinois | 354 | W68-50 |
1/10 | @Buffalo | 335 | 59% |
1/14 | W Michigan | 276 | 63% |
1/18 | Miami OH | 160 | 56% |
1/21 | @Toledo | 200 | 50% |
1/24 | @Ohio | 170 | 48% |
1/28 | Bowling Green | 275 | 63% |
1/31 | Akron | 141 | 54% |
2/4 | @E Michigan | 305 | 57% |
2/11 | C Michigan | 210 | 58% |
2/15 | Ohio | 170 | 56% |
2/18 | @Bowling Green | 275 | 55% |
2/22 | @Miami OH | 160 | 48% |
2/25 | Toledo | 200 | 58% |
3/1 | @Akron | 141 | 46% |
3/4 | @W Michigan | 276 | 55% |
3/7 | E Michigan | 305 | 64% |